More Pages: Holt Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52


Great Fact Finder-jreese7131@aol.com

The Triumph of Chastity?In late 1700s George, Prince of Wales, was every bit the scandalous Prince Charming, the lover of older, married women that his great-great-great nephew, the Duke of Windsor, was. George, who later became King George IV, even tossed over his mistress, Maria (Perdita) Robinson, in the same manner that the Duke of Windsor got rid of one of his mistresses. He wrote her a letter and refused to take her calls.
In both cases, the princes had a morally upright, dull father who never cheated on his wife. Filial rebellion and serial adultery are long-standing traditions in the British royal family.
In this book Jean Plaidy highlights the life of Perdita Robinson, George IV's first serious fling in a life full of flings. In it, she tells a lot about the character of George IV and sets the stage for "The Sweet Lass of Richmond" and "Indiscretions of the Queen."
Plaidy does us all a service by writing easy to read, entertaining novels about the British monarchy.


THE TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS OF BEING QUEEN...The marriage of Catherine of Braganza, who was from Portugal, to the newly restored King of England, Charles II, was a purely political alliance. Catherine was the daughter of King Juan IV of Portugal, who had previously been known as the Duke of Braganza, a vassal of Spain, as Spain had invaded Portugal in his father's time. When Catherine was five, after sixty years under Spanish rule, her father drove out the Spaniards and assumed his rightful role. His rule was a tenuous one, however, as the only foreign countries who recognized Juan IV as King of Portugal were France and England, who were enemies of Spain, at the time. The Pope, however, under the thumb of the Spaniards, did not, and other countries followed suit.
When Catherine, the Infanta of Portugal, was about eighteen years of age, her father died, leaving her mother, Donna Luiza, Queen Regent, of Portugal, as her brother, Alfonso, was only thirteen years old. Shortly thereafter, in the year 1658, Cromwell died, and within two years, Charles II of England was restored to his throne. Donna Luiza sought the marriage of her daughter, Catherine, to Charles II, as a way of being able to shore up her defenses against the ever pervasive threat of Spanish subjugation. By the time Catherine was twenty two, she was married to the thirty year old King of England.
Catherine was a Catholic Queen in a Protestant England that had never forgotten the cruelties of their last Catholic ruler, Mary Tudor, also known as "Blody Mary", for her excesses againt those of the Protestant faith. Consequently, the English were cool in their reception of Catherine. Moreover, she was married to a King who was a natural philanderer and whose amorous escapades with the beautiful, though notorious, Lady Castlemaine, as well as with the cockney actress, Nell Gwynne, among others, would cause her much heartache.
When Catherine failed to produce an heir, and it became clear that she was barren, there was much political intrigue in hopes that Charles II would divorce her and marry someone with whom he could beget an heir. That the King was capable of doing so was evident from the number of children he begat with his mistresses. Still, this merry monarch, much beloved by his people who viewed his amorous escapades with amusement, refused to discard his faithful and loyal wife, despite the fact that the public reviled her.
The author weaves a compelling, first person narrative of a Queen whose personal travails are little known. Against a backdrop of historical events, political intrigues, and well known personages, her story artfully unfolds, capturing the imagination of the reader. Hers is a story all too familiar. It is the story of a young noblewoman whose personal happines is subjugated to matters of state. Well written, it is a somewhat romaticized account of a life lived in the shadow of political expediency, and its pathos will keep the reader turning the pages.


The Pool of St. Branok

Great Walking tours of PragureYou cover little out of the way streets finding a wonderful statue that can only be seen by going around to the back of an embassy. Enjoy reading about the female patron saint of unhappily married women who grew grew a beard to be unattractive to her promised husband. These and other interesting stories are covered as you explore the sights of this beautiful city.
For friends heading to Prague, I tell them this book is a must! Even if you have time to take one of the walking tours, the book is well worth the money. Read all five tours before you go and find the one that is your favorite.


Woman in the MiddleThe House of Hanover, newly ascended to the English throne, would not have survived on the personal popularity of its kings. It took the cleverness of Caroline coupled with that of Sir Robert Walpole, the Prime Minister, to keep things in balance. Jean Plaidy tells the tale of the reign of George I through the personal trauma of this most remarkable of English Queens.


very informative

Fair treatment of world religions

Being a Buddhist in 18th century Sri LankaThis book is informative, elegantly written and precise and fulfills its aim of capturing in a nutshell the changes that too place in Buddhism, art and politics in the late medieval period and defining what consitutues a Kandyan style of painting. It is far less successful in its attempt at recreating a worldview. KS's world view is reconstructed from an analysis of what he did and proclaimed towards the revival of classical Buddhism. But I feel Holt misses an entire dimension of KS's character..... what I would call the hybrid nature of his cultural being. Indeed how did he live this condition of being born a Nayakkar and having to adopt the customs of the Kandyans for his own survival. The complex personality of the king who was versed enough in the Sinhala language to compose love songs in Sinhala but who until a rebellion was hatched against him continued the practice of annointing himself with ash does not come out in this book. We know for instance that after the rebellion - KNO Dharmadas mentions this point- not only did he give up the practice of annointing ash but he went so far as to ban the use of ash in the preparation of ola leaf manuscripts. Such clues exist and if one were to follow them a more complete and complex personnality would emerge. Even less convincing is Holt's analysis of the worldview of the common people whom he promises in his introduction to draw into the picture. The kings worldview and the people's appear to be interchangeable. Surely the Kings perception was not the same as that of the common man who visited the temples refurbished by the King. This book does not really investigate ways of thinking in 18th c. Sri Lanka. What I feel as a student of history is that Holt has overlooked the fact that the religious worldview of the common people cannot be looked at without relating it to the surrounding world of significance. But these failings apart, for a lay reader, this book has the merit of presenting very briefly many arguments and weaving all the important strands of scholarship on the late Medieval period into a comprehensive and coherent whole. For a more specialised readership, the unanswered questions and the loose ends in this book may open up new avenues of research and interest.


Beautifully illustrated coffee table book